Ducks 5 Gray Bats 2
South Oakland sweeps the season series.
QuackQuackQuackQuackQuackQuackQuackQuackQuackQuackQuackQuackQuackQuackQuackQuack
Game 20 Recap.
Ducks 5 Gray Bats 2
South Oakland sweeps the season series.
Ben4
checking out wordpress, using this to link stuff to southoaklandducks.com
Ducks 5 Gray Bats 2
South Oakland sweeps the season series.
Ben4 
July 5, 2009 at 9:59 pm |
two words. slump buster
July 5, 2009 at 11:49 pm |
We'll see you in the playoffs.
July 6, 2009 at 5:26 am |
3-18
July 6, 2009 at 2:03 pm |
It only takes one loss in round one to end the Ducks season.
"One is the loneliest number…", Three Dog Night.
July 6, 2009 at 2:23 pm |
we ended your season last year…
July 6, 2009 at 3:02 pm |
the game was a good one yesterday, granted, but we still found a way to win.
the way your seem to make it out is that we have luckily beaten you 3 times this season, by a combined score of 18-2, and we are ready to fall in the post- season, which i don't understand…
It'd be like me writing continuous posts bashing the owlz – Hooo have swept us this season – and making excuses about how we lost 3 games to them, and how we are better than the Owlz.
there is no evidence that we are better than the owlz just as their is no evidence that your team is better than ours.
along these lines i wouldn't go into a playoff game against the anyone not thinking we could win, the ducks won't concede to any team – the game still has to be played, but I wouldn't run my mouth like an idiot.
so along those lines i appreciate your confidence, and the problem with this format is it sets up the 3rd seed in our conference to be bounced potentially by a worse team after one bad game,
that's why i proposed the double play-in format in which 5 plays 6 then the winner plays 4 then that winner plays 3, or maybe the 1 seed while 2 plays 3- putting us where we started last season when we beat the rakers down the stretch to make the playoffs
you're not as bad as your record indicates, but that just means you've under-achieved.
i also appreciate that you still bring energy to each game, and play hard, but to talk shit when you have a winning % below .150 is insane. it was clear by the way your team acted that you hadn't won much or been leading after 4 innings.
i give you credit for at least staying positive, which i guess is the bonus of the everyone makes the playoffs format.
July 6, 2009 at 3:29 pm |
I agree, the Ducks first two wins over the Bats were decisive.
Yesterday was different.
July 6, 2009 at 3:36 pm |
i'm not a fan of the format either… version 4.0 for next year will be where its at.
I like having a reward for not forfeiting, but I think there should be more of a reward for a good regular season.
-Commish
July 6, 2009 at 4:21 pm |
So we won twice decisively and once less decisively. what does that even amount to aside from a season sweep?
nothing at all.
yesterday we still won, that's not different at all.
July 6, 2009 at 4:23 pm |
i think it's more of a matter of punishing teams that do forfeit, if you can see the difference…not rewarding teams for doing what their supposed to, but it's really two side of teh same coin there.
you're doing fine, commish…all solutions lead to new problems.
the league majority voted for all teams making playoffs, so this is what we have.
we'll get to that happy medium some day
July 6, 2009 at 8:56 pm |
"Boy those ducks are an ugly bunch."
-God
July 6, 2009 at 9:20 pm |
And yet I've produced a beautiful daughter, weird, huh?
why doe God have to rub it in anyway?
it's his fault we're ugly.
July 7, 2009 at 2:47 am |
Dont Be a Fool Wrap Your Tool
July 7, 2009 at 4:43 am |
ha, best thing that ever happened to me…good advice though, dick.